Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Kathryn's avatar

I loved The Salt Path and Landlines so my initial reaction to the Observer article was a sense of something akin to betrayal but after sitting with that a while I realized that there have always been biographies and autobiographies that were incomplete or less than honest, so am I being fair to expect more from a memoirist? I wasn’t present for the events and conversations so I can’t verify anything 100%. If I’d been present my recollection might be different than the author’s or another witness. That applies to other involved parties and the investigative reporter too. We are all human, we all decide how much of our lives to share, how large a window we want to open. I’m not about to burn these or any other books. I am trying to find some grace for all involved. Raynor Winn has posted a statement on her website that answers the allegations in the article in a plausible way but the full truth will ever only be known by those who lived it. www.raynorwinn.co.uk

Expand full comment
Claudia Kollschen's avatar

This was a very interesting post on many levels, Karen! Thanks for sharing your thoughts.

What particularly resonated with me was when you wrote: "The truth is that to rewire my brain, so I’m no longer living in survival mode takes a lot more than living a quieter life, but who wants to read that changing your beliefs and behaviours can take years and is a tough road to travel; who wants to read that letting go of people pleasing, performing and being self critical is ongoing ‘work’ and isn’t just a matter of thinking differently? Not the stuff of dreams!" I couldn't agree more because I found myself in a very similar (or you could say the same) situation.

When I started my Substack almost a year ago, I thought I was further along on my healing path, that I had already changed my life and learned so much that I could pass on experiences and knew something that might help others. When the inevitable (that's what I know now), but for me at that moment surprising setbacks happened, although I thought I had it (almost) all figured out, I wasn't sure how to deal with it on my blog. Even the name "Happy Quiet Life" didn't seem to fit any longer. What to do? Would I present only the happy sides now although I went through tough times and ended up in survial mode again because people would expect that and would want to read only the good stuff? Or would I abandon my blog and deal with the setbacks privately? Or would I be honest with my journey and share my diffculties? (But exactly, who wants to read that? Here's where the quote above comes back in again.)

In the end, I decided to be very open and honest about it. For myself and for potential readers. Honesty was something I missed a lot with others, I'm not one who for superficiality either or for showing only the perfect, glamourous side, carefully curated and then passing it on as real life. Most of the time it isn't. In most cases, we actually know this, but sometimes we just don't want to believe it because we want to hope it can be true.

As inspiring as these stories can be, I think they put a lot of pressure on us. When we can't change as seemingly fast as others or we aren't successful changing our beliefs and behaviours in an instant, when just one walk doesn't heal everything, there's clearly something wrong with us, there has to be, right? Because others did it before, so it must be possible. Which can make us feel worse.

So as much as we need uplifting, inspiring stories, it's a good idea to remember that they are more often than not curated to fit a need. (I'm not writing about The Salt Path here, just in general.) But there are other needs too, like honesty and openness about what it can really be like. I like it real, not perfect, and it gives me so much more to read about honest journeys, ups and downs, learnings and setbacks and all. These are the Substack I enjoy the most - like yours. :) And I enjoy writing one of them too.

Expand full comment
27 more comments...

No posts